Skip to content

Direction setting

Quarterly. Leadership + PO + Tech Lead in a room. Vision and goals are re-read. New direction signals are weighed. No initiative is born or killed in this session. Direction sets the field on which initiatives are later judged.

When

  • Quarterly, ideally two weeks before the Quarterly portfolio review. Direction first, then portfolio decisions.
  • Whenever a strong signal threatens the current direction — a market shift, a major client change, a falsified strategic bet. The session is called explicitly, not scheduled into existence.

Who

  • Leadership — owns the bet.
  • PO — translates the chain's evidence into direction-relevant signals.
  • Tech Lead — translates the chain's technical reality into direction-relevant signals.

Time-box

Two hours. Long enough to walk the artefacts; short enough to force priorities.

Inputs

  • The current Vision/Mission artefact.
  • The current Goals & Objectives — with progress notes.
  • The last quarter's signal readings and model updates (aggregated).
  • The last quarter's chain-level distribution from the bug tracker.

Agenda

TimeWhat
0–15 minRe-read Vision and Mission aloud. Are these still falsifiable claims we'd defend? If the language no longer fits the team's actual work, that is itself a finding.
15–45 minWalk each Goal. Progress vs target. "This goal: still load-bearing? Still measurable? Still the right number?" Edits are made on the artefact, in place.
45–75 minRead aggregated signals. What did the team learn this quarter about the world? Which assumptions have shifted? Which named persons' situations changed?
75–105 minDirection adjustments. Three forms: (1) sharpen the current direction; (2) retire a goal that has been met or has decayed; (3) add a goal forced by new signal.
105–120 minWrite the changes. Vision/Mission/Goals edited in place. Signed and dated.

Outputs

  • Updated Vision / Mission / Goals — edited in source, not in a meeting note. The artefact carries the change forward.
  • A one-page direction note — what changed this quarter and why. Read by the team and the client; archived next to prior quarters.

What good looks like

The session edits a small number of words in load-bearing places — and the team can feel the change in the next initiative kickoff. "Last quarter we said the goal was time saved; this quarter we sharpened it to time-saved-without-trust-cost. The next brief's prediction got tighter as a result."

A good direction-setting session closes one goal at least as often as it adds one. The goal-list does not accumulate; it cycles.

Anti-pattern

The session becomes a strategy off-site — long, abstract, slide-driven, producing a deck nobody reads. Fix: the session edits the live artefacts. If no artefact changed, the session did not happen.

A second anti-pattern: deciding scope. Initiatives are killed and funded at Quarterly portfolio review, not here. Direction is the field; portfolio is the moves on the field.

See also

200apps · How We Work · NWIRE